tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11049085.post4472938868285718100..comments2023-10-19T22:31:11.386+03:00Comments on Alex Pinsker: Generics collection serializerAlex Pinskerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01712994496088023843noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11049085.post-13481943462640729622007-06-06T15:48:00.000+03:002007-06-06T15:48:00.000+03:00Hey Boris, thanks for your reply and reference to ...Hey Boris, thanks for your reply and reference to the Paul's solution! I think his solution is better in the way that it provides 1st class serializable dictionary. On the other hand - it's more code/more complexity.<BR/><BR/>p.s. your blog profile-sharing is disabled, so I can't get to your blog from your comment.Alex Pinskerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01712994496088023843noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11049085.post-37471553572061584962007-06-06T15:41:00.000+03:002007-06-06T15:41:00.000+03:00p.s.Please read 'Tuple' as 'KeyValuePair' in my po...p.s.<BR/>Please read 'Tuple' as 'KeyValuePair' in my post :) <BR/>As I had discussion with a friend of my on why it can't be serializable - I want to add that it's since KeyValuePair has no set properties and XmlSerializer by design doesn't serialize read-only properties.Alex Pinskerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01712994496088023843noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11049085.post-59298429955368333552007-06-06T13:56:00.000+03:002007-06-06T13:56:00.000+03:00This is a good idea, but why not using Serializabl...This is a good idea, but why not using SerializableDictionary as implemented in Paul Welter's Weblog: http://weblogs.asp.net/pwelter34/archive/2006/05/03/444961.aspx ?Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13864094556362517427noreply@blogger.com